This is just one of the thousands of examples that could blow the heavier bullet-simple physics nonsense out of the water-may I suggest you read anything to do with Ballistic Coefficients-even 5 minutes would help. Now let us compare with a lighter 308- let's say the 168gr SMK, stock #1930, BC. WRONG, Really Wrong, when you say "simple physics", do you mean simple minded physics? Have you ever heard of BC? Let's us examine this a little bit further: Using the Sierra ed 5 manual, the 170 gr 308, stock #2010 has a BC of 2400fps and above. Originally Posted By: paw printOriginally Posted By: MikeThe people who say that are wrong. I use a combo of bullet weights in competition based on conditions. Now that is also a trade off because the biggest cause for a miss in field is range estimation error and the lighter faster bullet generally has a shallower fall angle making hits more probable. On thing missed here though is some times the lighter bullet does not drift as much in wind because its lower fling tragectory does not get high enough to catch the faster winds ( I say sometimes becaiuse wind speed in relationship to above ground height is not a constant) With that said I believe the heaviest bullet you can push fast enough in your caliber will be the most consistent for wind drift and weird ups and downs. This is generally when case capacity does not allow the heavier bullet to be pushed fast enough.Example I think the lighter bullets do better in 6.5x47 but in 260 Rem I believe the 139 and 142 are ticket. Sometimes in same caliber lighter bullets will out perform heavier bullets. I believe he understood it so well he figured everyone on here would know what he meant as well. Knowing Mike he did not mean all heavy bullets. Obviously a brick does not fly as well as a needle no matter the weight. The basic thought on heavy versus light discussion is based on both bullets being of same design. The heavy versus light bullet discussion will go on for years and probably never have an exact answer. In any caliber, the heavier bullet will ALWAYS be better at distance than a lighter one. r/CricketWireless is an unaffiliated community, we welcome all positive and negative feedback, but please be articulate in your complaints.Originally Posted By: MikeThe people who say that are wrong. Try out unlimited 5Mbps 2-3Mbps over Sprint network for 50$/mo at /r/yourKarma. Tired of too many rules? Don't care for voice? Want a simple unlimited WiFI hotspot? A big fan of Swiss cheese? Like proprietary and unportable hotspot devices and a lack of BYOD support? The 128kbps downstream throttling is too slow? Don't care about uploads? Activation fees are too confusing? Late fees are too odd on prepaid? AT&T network sucks? Or maybe you're missing the $2.25 in mandatory monthly fees from being a regular part of your monthly phone bill diet?Ĭheck out /r/RokMobile, a third-party MVNO with Verizon-based coverage, offering unlimited 256kbps, with 5GB 4G LTE, for 49,99 + 2,25 = 52,24 USD/mo. However, do note that some desktop web-pages nowadays may average 4MB as per, which would take 8 seconds to load at 4Mbps or 4 seconds at 8Mbps (which is 1MB/s, after you convert the bits to bytes). See for an idea how much video takes but 8Mbps should be sufficient even for 1080p. How much is 8Mbps or 4Mbps? For comparison, /r/TMobile's /r/BingeOn throttles all video traffic to 1.5Mbps, which limits Netflix and YouTube to 480p. A set amount of high-speed usage is offered each month as part of a data bucket (e.g., 2.5GB 40$, 5GB 50$ or 10GB 60$), subsequently, all downstream data gets throttled at 128kbps downstream after your original data bucket is exceeded (unlike on T-Mobile, the Twitter uploads do still work on Cricket Wireless even after the throttling, since the throttling is only applied to the downstream traffic!). See for frequency details for each network.Īll data plans include 4G LTE access (throttled to 8Mbps), HSPA+ access (throttled to 4Mbps) and UMTS, and GSM/EDGE access. Note that GSM/EDGE is in the process of being completely shutdown by 2017, and may already be refarmed to HSPA+ or LTE in some spectrum-constrained regions. Service is offered over GSM / EDGE, UMTS / 4G HSPA+ and 4G LTE networks. Cricket Wireless, formerly Aio Wireless, is an AT&T-owned AT&T MVNO.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |